Page 2 of 3
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:59 am
by CoreStylerz
nix wrote:Can anyone help me with this->
What I would like to do is turn a stream bool into a
green bool, without using mono to float.
I don't want to send like 2000 ticks per second to the
'mono to float'
I would like to have one tick when the bool changes-hmm
--using Ruby?
I don't think that ruby module can be linked to mono. You should in any case use green data before, ruby can be used to processing timing/ticks with green.
But Flowstone V.3 should have some operation for mono and stream data, or i can't understand what kind of use for ruby with audio data.
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:40 am
by nix
Thanks again man.
I'll wait to see what is in v3
All success mate
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:36 pm
by infuzion
nix wrote:Can anyone help me with this->
What I would like to do is turn a stream bool into a
green bool, without using mono to float.
I don't want to send like 2000 ticks per second to the
'mono to float'
I would like to have one tick when the bool changes-hmm
--using Ruby?
Dude, why the off-topic question please?
Pro tip: Starting a new thread is actually 1 extra less click!
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:41 pm
by nix
Sorry bro,
I thought it was a real-time application of Ruby.
I am a little wiser for my query.
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 2:58 pm
by CoreStylerz
In any case, reality can be explained by developers... but they read the "support" forum?
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:01 pm
by infuzion
nix wrote:I thought it was a real-time application of Ruby. I am a little wiser for my query.
2000 triggers/second < real-time; sounds like MIDI timing?
CoreStylerz wrote:In any case, reality can be explained by developers... but they read the "support" forum?
Like the SM forum, there is very very little interaction by the devs here, if they read everything at all. I've sent 2 direct emails to both SM & FS adreess, as well as posting here, & have yet to receive any response from any of the 3 devs.
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:42 pm
by CoreStylerz
infuzion wrote:Like the SM forum, there is very very little interaction by the devs here, if they read everything at all. I've sent 2 direct emails to both SM & FS adreess, as well as posting here, & have yet to receive any response from any of the 3 devs.
They should call this forum "community" nor support. Support mean a service isn't provided here.
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 10:19 am
by nix
It's a pity they don't do a round once a day, IMO.
Well, ideally infuzion,
it would run at samplerate
It's for MIDI guitar note ons
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:30 pm
by infuzion
nix wrote:It's a pity they don't do a round once a day, IMO.
A round per week would be great; I know they have to program, be with their families, etc.
But a round per year, to only to ask for more money for an (yet) unfulfilled promise is not good form IMHO.
Re: Reality of v3's Ruby in Real-Time Applications
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 5:34 pm
by CoreStylerz
infuzion wrote:nix wrote:It's a pity they don't do a round once a day, IMO.
A round per week would be great; I know they have to program, be with their families, etc.
But a round per year, to only to ask for more money for an (yet) unfulfilled promise is not good form IMHO.
+1