...you can do convolution in SM/FS but it IS limited.. I don't know why you are saying that; most of AcmeBarGigs are sophisticated convolution (licensed by a guy who worked for a CPU manufacturer). Ken's issues have been mostly with the preset system, not convolution.

So,are you saying its NOT ...

Yes, fact is you should try and make for yourself whatever the vst does you want to place inside. As I mentioned earlier, you can do convolution in SM/FS but it IS limited. Ruby is not an option for this code either, at least not to its entirety because of its garbage collection. In fact, I am ...

1. C isn't interpreted, ie. it won't run in real time as you develop - you have to code, compile, test. While Ruby is interpreted so as with the other FlowStone modules it runs as you write it! Which is pretty cool. Ruby is really fast to learn and compared to using C, being able to have just one ...

host the rambling musings of its devotees
If they do a filter search for "trogluddite" posts made between the hours of 2am and 4am on Fridays and Saturdays, that should catch most of the ones I posted when I was REALLY drunk.
If they delete those, that ought to save them a few Terabytes of server ...

I never understood why Malc and jorge never allowed the loading of VST plugs?

Shoo wrote:How make API call in Flowstone?
Example, please...

PS:
No Ruby.

Yes, how do you make api calls? With Ruby I suppose?

64bit Windows and MAC.

What you can't make a simple API call in Flowstone? The windows API has efficient means of controlling windows..

DSP wrote:I'm here

Here's a simple example of a menu selector (using a multiplexer)

Aren't multiplexors more of a drain on CPU? In Synthmaker they were, did they fix that in Flowstone?

Then take a trip to the synthmaker forum to have access to literally thousands and thousands of code examples....